Oregon code § 107.005 Annulment of void marriage;
declaration of validity; effect of declaration.
(1) A marriage may be declared void from the beginning for any of the causes specified in ORS 106.020; and, whether so
declared or not, shall be deemed and held to be void in any action, suit or proceeding in which it may come into question.
(2)
When either husband or wife claims or pretends that the marriage is void or voidable under the provisions of ORS 106.020,
it may at the suit of the other be declared valid or that it was void from the beginning or that it is void from the time
of the judgment.
(3) A marriage once declared valid by the judgment of a divorce court
having jurisdiction thereof, in a suit for that purpose, cannot afterward be questioned for the same cause directly or otherwise.
|
Oregon divorce statutes 107.015 Grounds
for annulment or dissolution of marriage
(1) Except
as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a judgment for the annulment or dissolution of a marriage may be rendered:
(a)
When either party to the marriage was incapable of making the marriage contract or consenting to the marriage for want of
legal age or sufficient understanding; or
(b) When the consent of either party was obtained
by force or fraud.
(2) A judgment for the annulment or dissolution of a marriage may not be
rendered for a reason described in subsection (1) of this section if the marriage contract was afterward ratified.
Back to Top↑
|
 |
Oregon code § 107.015 Grounds for dissolution
of marriage.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a judgment for the annulment or dissolution of a marriage may
be rendered:
(a) When either party to the marriage was incapable of making the marriage contract
or consenting to the marriage for want of legal age or sufficient understanding; or
(b) When
the consent of either party was obtained by force or fraud.
(2) A judgment for the annulment
or dissolution of a marriage may not be rendered for a reason described in subsection (1) of this section if the marriage
contract was afterward ratified.
Oregon divorce statutes 107.025 Irreconcilable differences as grounds for dissolution or separation.
|
(1) A judgment for the dissolution of a marriage or a permanent or unlimited separation may be rendered when irreconcilable
differences between the parties have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage.
(2)
A judgment for separation may be rendered when:
(a) Irreconcilable differences between the
parties have caused a temporary or unlimited breakdown of the marriage;
(b) The parties make
and file with the court an agreement suspending for a period not less than one year their obligation to live together as
husband and wife, and the court finds such agreement to be just and equitable; or
(c) Irreconcilable
differences exist between the parties and the continuation of their status as married persons preserves or protects legal,
financial, social or religious interest.
Back to Top↑
|
 |
Oregon code § 107.093 Restraining order;
request for hearing.
(1) After a petition for marriage annulment, separation or dissolution is filed and upon service of summons and petition
upon the respondent as provided in ORCP 7, a restraining order is in effect against the petitioner and the respondent until
a final judgment is issued, until the petition for marriage annulment, separation or dissolution is dismissed, or until further
order of the court.
(2) The restraining order issued under this section shall restrain the
petitioner and respondent from:
(a) Canceling, modifying, terminating or allowing to lapse
for nonpayment of premiums any policy of health insurance, homeowner or renter insurance or automobile insurance that one
party maintains to provide coverage for the other party or a minor child of the parties, or any life insurance policy that
names either of the parties or a minor child of the parties as a beneficiary.
(b) Changing
beneficiaries or covered parties under any policy of health insurance, homeowner or renter insurance or automobile insurance
that one party maintains to provide coverage for the other party or a minor child of the parties, or any life insurance policy.
(c)
Transferring, encumbering, concealing or disposing of property in which the other party has an interest, in any manner, without
written consent of the other party or an order of the court, except in the usual course of business or for necessities of
life. This paragraph does not apply to payment by either party of:
(A) Attorney fees in the
existing action;
(B) Real estate and income taxes;
(C) Mental health therapy expenses for either party or a minor child of the parties; or
(D) Expenses necessary to provide for the safety and welfare of a party or a minor child of
the parties.
(d) Making extraordinary expenditures without providing written notice and an accounting of
the extraordinary expenditures to the other party. This paragraph does not apply to payment by either party of expenses necessary
to provide for the safety and welfare of a party or a minor child of the parties.
(3) Either
party restrained under this section may apply to the court for further temporary orders, including modification or revocation
of the restraining order issued under this section.
(4) The restraining order issued under this section shall also include a notice that either
party may request a hearing on the restraining order by filing a request for hearing with the court.
(5) A copy of the restraining order issued under this section shall be attached to the summons.
(6) A party who violates a term of a restraining order issued under this section is subject
to imposition of remedial sanctions under ORS 33.055 based on the violation, but is not subject to:
(a) Criminal prosecution based on the violation; or
(b) Imposition of punitive sanctions under ORS 33.065 based on the violation.
Oregon divorce statutes 107.097 Ex parte temporary child custody or parenting time orders; temporary protective
order of restraint; hearing.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, a court may not enter ex parte a temporary order under
ORS 107.095, 109.103 or 109.119 providing for the custody of, or parenting time with, a child.
(2)(a) A party may apply to a court for a temporary protective order of restraint by filing
with the court an affidavit conforming to the requirements of ORS 109.767.
(b) Upon receipt
of an application under this subsection, the court may issue a temporary
|
protective order of restraint restraining
and enjoining each party from:
(A) Changing the child’s usual place of residence;
(B)
Interfering with the present placement and daily schedule of the child;
(C) Hiding or secreting
the child from the other party;
(D) Interfering with the other party’s usual contact
and parenting time with the child;
(E) Leaving the state with the child without the written
permission of the other party or the permission of the court; or
(F) In any manner disturbing
the current schedule and daily routine of the child until custody or parenting time has been determined.
(c)
A copy of the order and the supporting affidavit must be served on the other party in the manner of service of a summons
under ORCP 7. (3)(a) A court may enter ex parte a temporary order providing for child custody of, or parenting time with,
a child if:
(A) The party requesting an order is present in court and presents an affidavit alleging
that the child is in immediate danger; and
(B) The court finds, based on the facts presented
in the party’s testimony and affidavit
and in the testimony of the other party, if the other party is present, that the child is in immediate danger.
(b)
The party requesting an order under this subsection shall provide the court with telephone numbers where the party can be
reached at any time during the day and a contact address.
(c)
A copy of the order and the supporting affidavit must be served on the other party in the manner of service of a summons
under ORCP 7. (4)(a) A party against whom an order is entered under subsection (2) or (3) of this section may request a hearing
by filing with the court a hearing request described in subsection (2) or (3) of this section at any time while the order
is in effect.
(b) The divorce court shall make reasonable efforts to hold a hearing within 14 days
and shall hold a hearing no later than 21 days after receipt of the request for the hearing. The court shall notify each
party of the time, date and place of the hearing.
(c) An order issued under subsection (2)
or (3) of this section remains in effect through the date of the hearing. If the party against whom the order was entered
fails to appear at the hearing without good cause, the court shall continue the order in effect. If the party who obtained
the order fails to appear at the hearing without good cause, the divorce court shall vacate the order.
(d) The issue at a hearing to contest:
(A) A temporary protective
order of restraint is limited to a determination of the status quo at the time the order was issued. If the child’s
usual place of residence cannot be determined, the court may make any further order the court finds appropriate in the best
interests of the child.
(B) A temporary order for the custody of, or parenting time with, a
child is limited to whether the child was in immediate danger at the time the order was issued.
(5)
The State Court Administrator shall prescribe the content and form of a request for a hearing described in subsections (2)
and (3) of this section.
(6) As used in this section:
(a) “Child’s usual
place of residence” has the meaning given that term
in ORS 107.138.
(b) “Party’s usual contact and parenting time,” “present
placement and daily schedule of the child” and “current schedule and daily routine of the child” have the
meanings given “parent’s usual contact and parenting time,” “present placement and daily schedule
of the child” and “current
schedule and daily routine of the child” in ORS 107.138.
Back to Top↑ |
 |
Oregon code § 107.102 Parenting
plan; content.
(1) In any proceeding to establish or modify a judgment providing for parenting time with a child, except for matters
filed under ORS 107.700 to 107.735, there shall be developed and filed with the court a parenting plan to be included in
the judgment. A parenting plan may be either general or detailed.
(2) A general parenting plan
may include a general outline of how parental responsibilities and parenting time will be shared and may allow the parents
to develop a more detailed agreement on an informal basis. However, a general parenting plan must set forth the minimum amount
of parenting time and access a noncustodial parent is entitled to have.
(3) A detailed parenting
plan may include, but need not be limited to, provisions relating to:
|
(a) Residential schedule;
(b) Holiday, birthday and vacation planning;(c) Weekends, including holidays, and school in-service days preceding
or following weekends;
(d) Decision-making and responsibility;
(e) Information sharing
and access;
(f) Relocation of parents;
(g) Telephone access;
(h) Transportation; and
(i) Methods for resolving disputes.
(4)(a) The court shall develop
a detailed parenting plan when:
(A) So requested by either parent; or
(B) The parent or parents
are unable to develop a parenting plan.
(b) In developing a parenting plan under this subsection,
the court may consider only the best interests of the child and the safety of the parties.
Back to Top↑ |
 |
 |
Ohio code § 107.137 Factors
considered in determining custody of child.
(1) In determining custody of a minor child under ORS 107.105 or 107.135, the court shall give primary consideration to
the best interests and welfare of the child. In determining the best interests and welfare of the child, the court shall
consider the following relevant factors:
(a) The emotional ties between the child and other
family members;
(b) The interest of the parties in and attitude toward the child;
(c)
The desirability of continuing an existing relationship;
(d) The abuse of one parent by the
other;
(e) The preference for the primary caregiver of the child, if the caregiver is deemed
fit by the court; and
(f) The willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate and encourage
a close and continuing relationship between the other parent and the child. However, the court may
not consider such
willingness and ability if one parent shows that the other parent has sexually assaulted or engaged in a pattern of behavior
of abuse against the parent or a child and that a continuing relationship with
|
the other parent will endanger the health or safety of either parent
or the child.
(2)
The best interests and welfare of the child in a custody matter shall not be determined by isolating any one of the relevant
factors referred to in subsection (1) of this section, or any other relevant factor, and relying on it to the exclusion of
other factors. However, if a parent has committed abuse, as defined in ORS 107.705, there is a rebuttable presumption that
it is not in the best interests and welfare of the child to award sole or joint custody of the child to the parent who committed
the abuse.
(3) In determining custody of a minor child under ORS 107.105 or 107.135, the court
shall consider the conduct, marital status, income, social environment or life style of either party only if it is shown
that any of these factors are causing or may cause emotional or physical damage to the child.
(4)
No preference in custody shall be given to the mother over the father for the sole reason that she is the mother, nor shall
any preference be given to the father over the mother for the sole reason that he is the father.
Back to Top↑
|
 |
Ohio code § 107.765
When referral to mediation permitted; scope of mediation; report to court of outcome of mediation.
(1) In a domestic relations suit, where it appears on the face of one or more pleadings, appearances, petitions or motions,
including any form of application for the setting aside, alteration or modification of an order or judgment, that custody,
parenting time or visitation of a child is contested, the court may, when appropriate, refer the matter for mediation of
the contested issues prior to or concurrent with the setting of the matter for hearing. The purpose of the mediation is to
assist the parties in reaching a workable settlement of the contested issues instead of litigating those issues before the
court. Unless the court provides for the mediation of financial issues under ORS 107.755 (4), the mediator shall not consider
issues of property division or spousal or
|
child support, in connection with the mediation of a dispute concerning
child custody, parenting time or visitation, or otherwise, without the written approval of both parties or their counsel.
(2) The mediator shall report to the court and to counsel for the parties the outcome of
the mediation at the conclusion of the mediation proceeding. The mediator shall report in writing to the court and to counsel
for the parties any agreement reached by the parties as a result of the mediation, and the agreement shall be incorporated
in a proposed order or judgment provision prepared for the court. If the parties do not reach an agreement, the mediator
shall report only that fact to the court and to counsel for the parties, but shall not make a recommendation to the court
without the written consent of the parties or their counsel.
Back to Top↑ |
 |
The divorce statues in Oregon that
appears here may not include all provisions of Family Law. Some redacting has occurred. You should consult the OH code
or an Oregon divorce attorney.
|
|